A humorous piece of news in papers today that says GoAir has
decided to recruit only airhostesses from now on instead of the 'heavier' male
flight pursers. The idea is to lighten the aircraft to reduce fuel burn because
of increased operating costs. I find this idea absurd , unimaginative
and too shortsighted and in the post below I will present my case why I consider
it so.
Female Air Hostesses rule over male pursers |
As per the article here is the logic presented for making
such a business case.
“Go Air currently has 330 cabin crew members,
40% of whom are males. Every additional kg on board costs Rs 3 per flight hour.
With an airhostess weighing about 15-20kg less than a male flight purser, Go
expects to save about Rs 2.5 crore to Rs 3 crore annually. We are
reducing the weight on board our aircraft. The size of inflight magazines has
been reduced. The potable water tanks are no longer being filled to capacity as
only 35% to 40% of that water is actually used. Now the water tanks are filled
60%.
Before I comment on this cost cutting activity let me list
out some data points on GoAir that I will use to support my argument against
this logic of choosing male pursers over female air hostesses.
- The airline currently operates across 21 destinations, 156 daily flights and approximately 1060 weekly flights. Reference - http://www.goair.in/January2_2012.aspx
- GoAir has a fleet size of 15 aircrafts all A320 -200 that have a maximum capacity of 180 passengers.
- The Wadia Group-owned airline made a net loss of R133.72 crore in FY 2011-12.
Here is my argument:
1060 flights / week
will translate to 55120 flights /year and the total number of male pursers in
GoAir is 132 out of a total of 330 cabin crew.
If the staff is evenly distributed on all flights and their rest hours
are same, all the male pursers combined will take 22048 flights. If one
individual adds 15-20 kgs extra, net additional weight will be 385840 Kgs
(taking average weight of 17.5 Kg). With Rs 3 as the incremental cost for every
additional 1 kg of weight the total amount will be 1,157,520 (Eleven
Lakhs Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty only). Where did the figure of 2.5 – 3 Cr Annual Savings
come from??
With a net loss figure running into 100+ crore you are doing a full fledged research to contain few lakhs (notional) that will seemingly accrue from meaningless measures like these ??
GoAir great minds answer some of my questions here:
- At what occupancy % has the premise been made?
- What is the average weight of passengers on board?
- What is the mix of passengers i.e. men, women and children and is it same for all the sectors?
- Which all GoAir counters in airports weigh the passengers before boarding?? If that is not done how the total flight weight is calculated?
- When the flights are not running to the full capacity what is the threshold point where any incremental weight does not affect the flying cost?
Dear
GoAir !!
With a market share of 7-8% in the Indian domestic market, that flies handles
70 Million (2011) passengers annually (Source:
CAPA – Centre for Aviation & Indian DGCA) I can safely say that you don’t fly more than 5-6 million
passengers in a year. If I do the mathematics right your average occupancy/
flight will not exceed 100 odd passengers (Airbus
A320-200 has a seating capacity of 180 pax). With this level of occupancy I don’t think even an
overweight 100 Kg male purser can make any difference. Even if they can, the
figure is too minuscule and absurd to be even thought off as a cost cutting
measure. If your think tank has enough time to invest in such measures such as
replacing the male pursers I will be give you more such distractions. Do
some research on absurd statistics like the average height of female
air hostesses, their arm length, their reach to the overhead bins, their
strength to lift and arrange heavy hand bags and their efficiency to deal with odd passengers? My bet is you will again come up with some
ridiculous observations and put that as a cost cutting measure. If the
management gives you enough bandwidth to do such researches no wonder your
market share is the lowest in the market.
Till
today I thought, increasing fuel prices, intense
competition , lower fares, weakness of the rupee were your prime concerns to run
a profitable business, but I never knew you weigh your cabin crew to take
business decisions.
4 comments:
That's very humorous and interesting post..Really loved the way you had taken up the point with GoAir
I am sure recession and a bad year has given them enough time to spend on cost cutting measures like these. I find it funny and stupid.
Dnt worry GoAir will have a second thought soon.
I am sure they will come with another 'out of box' idea. If there is no business at least enthrall the crowd with some logic defying ideas :):)
Post a Comment